As professionals in the logistics and hazardous goods industry, we understand the importance of proper training and compliance when handling dangerous goods. However, there's an issue that many of us have encountered in India: the discrepancy in how DGCI recognizes different levels of Dangerous Goods (DG) training.
Currently, Category 1, Category 3, and Category 6 cover various aspects of Dangerous Goods Handling:
- Category 1: Meant for exporters.
- Category 3: Designed for freight forwarders.
- Category 6: Specific to airline staff and covers the most comprehensive aspects, including subjects from both Category 1 and Category 3.
The problem arises when DGCI does not recognize professionals trained in Category 3 (freight forwarders) as eligible to perform Category 1 tasks. This is despite the fact that Category 3 training includes all the subjects of Category 1, meaning that a forwarder with Category 3 training should be fully qualified to manage DG-related tasks on behalf of exporters.
Why This Matters
This inconsistency creates unnecessary hurdles and costs for businesses and professionals alike. Freight forwarders who are already trained in Category 3 are being asked to undergo additional training in Category 1, which is redundant and time-consuming. This not only delays operations but also creates additional expenses for businesses working with hazardous goods.
A Call for Fair Recognition
It's time for DGCI to recognize the overlapping subjects in DG training categories and update its policies to reflect the true competencies of professionals. Category 3 certified individuals should be allowed to carry out the tasks under Category 1, as they already possess the necessary knowledge and skills.
This change will help streamline operations, reduce unnecessary costs, and make compliance easier for businesses that are already under immense pressure to meet international regulations. Let's push for a more practical, efficient, and fair system in DG handling.